Would President Obama have more support if he got rid of a lot of the nut-cases he has for ';czars';?

Could it be that most of his ';czars'; are so far removed from normal society they are alienating the president?Would President Obama have more support if he got rid of a lot of the nut-cases he has for ';czars';?
Probably. Most people(i know) feel that the czars are just a way for Obama to find a way around electing actual officials to govern departments. His approval would (maybe) rise slightly because the people would feel a little more';in the loop';Would President Obama have more support if he got rid of a lot of the nut-cases he has for ';czars';?
It's not just his czars, but his personal relationships. Many of the people Obama deals with are of questionable character. Anita Dunn, Rahm Emanuel, Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, etc. all instill pause. The terms ';Marxist';, ';Racist';, ';Maoist'; keep emerging.
He has 57% support....so I'm not really sure he would have more support if he did anything differently. His advisors aren't 'removed from normal society' and most educated people understand that the President needs people with specific knowledge to discuss the goals and outcomes with him.