If you mean iPod Touch, yes. They're identical in dimension and the placement of the buttons.Will 2nd generation ipod cases work with 3rd generation ipods?
If its an ipod touch then yes
any other im not sure
Friday, May 14, 2010
Which language has the most endings or cases?
I know Quechua has 19 endings that can be put on a noun.Which language has the most endings or cases?
i guess quechua then.Which language has the most endings or cases?
Polish has 7 cases, and 3 genders, but I don't think there's an actual list of noun endings. Each noun usually declines according to one of about a dozen patterns.
I once read that Basque has over 400 different
endings that can be put on a noun.
i guess quechua then.Which language has the most endings or cases?
Polish has 7 cases, and 3 genders, but I don't think there's an actual list of noun endings. Each noun usually declines according to one of about a dozen patterns.
I once read that Basque has over 400 different
endings that can be put on a noun.
Set procedure for Collection Agencies to accept cases?
I am having a dispute with a CPA, who wants to charge me $200 for no useful service. He threatened me to deal via collection agency and affect my credit report. He is going to send me an invoice. I can argue his case in court, as his charge comes without no prior discussion of charges for his services. He pretty much surprised me with his charges saying the services are already done, now you pay $200 for this. I want to stop him to go to collection agency. What should I do? If I reject his invoice with a Certified mail explaining why I dont think the charge is correct, will it hamper his effort to go to collection agency? Is there a time after which the collection agency will accept his case?Set procedure for Collection Agencies to accept cases?
Okay there is really nothing you can do except dispute it until to comes into a collection agency. Not accepting the invoice will not help. Get it, and keep it. Document your dispute send him by sending letters (certified). Also did you sign anything accepting the servies? if so get copies of everything. Keep your cool, he cannot threaten you with action he doesn't intend to take! After he sends you to a collection agency the FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) kicks in and there is certain things that must happen.
the collection agency must verify that teh debt is good and current.
Also You will have a 30 day disputing period from the time the coll agency contacts you to dispute the bill, it must be marked disputed on your credit report by the coll. agency. If he cannot prove it's legitimacy to the coll. agency too. It must be canceled off your credit report and the coll. cannot persue it. a dn tehn hes pretty SOL- you can also take him to court after all this if it is false for deformation of charicter.
-Hope that helps a bitSet procedure for Collection Agencies to accept cases?
Can he send it to an agency? Yes. Will they accept the case? For only $200, probably not. Why? It's not worth their time.
Collection agents are under a lot of preasure to show results. In your case they will have to start by wasting time calling you on the phone for a few weeks to threaten you. During this time they are sending you letters. The cost in time/money starts adding up.
The agency gets from 30%-50% of what they collect. So in your case, is it worth spending $50 to make $60-$100? Nope. They are more interested in pestering the 70 year old retiree with medical problems who owes $23,000.
Your concern is their interfering with your credit history. So here is what you do. GET ARMED! Knowledge is your only weapon. Read the links below.
Send the CPA a letter outlining your objection to the debt, and threaten legal action if any negative reports are discovered on your credit history. NOTE: It is extremely unlikely that he has the ability to get this on your credit history. They do not have reporting rights. If he does somehow manage to do it, you have a wide range of laws to punish him under, including mail fraud.
Now if he gives it to Mr. Collection Agent, don't believe the nonsense that they are looking out for your interest and will ';verify'; your debt first. Their idea of ';verify the debt'; is to call the CPA and ask if you really owe this debt. If he says YES then they come after you. After all, they are in the business of debt collection, and this is how they earn a living.
What you want to do is send a letter to the collection agency demanding that they ';validate'; the debt. The differance is that now Mr. Collection Agent must research your debt, request all copies of contracts, logs, receipts, bills, and anything to do with how the amount you owe was calculate. And they must demonstrate that you actually have a legal obligation to pay it! After you revue this information, you decide if he has a case or not.
Mr. Collection Agent gets your letter, realizes he's about to spend a few hours of work for only $60-$100, and suddenly sends you a letter saying they are sending the collection back to the original creditor and removing your negative credit report.
Trust me, I've counseled many people on this. The worst case is they will sue you, and you simply explain your side to the judge. For $200 it's worth the gamble.
Okay there is really nothing you can do except dispute it until to comes into a collection agency. Not accepting the invoice will not help. Get it, and keep it. Document your dispute send him by sending letters (certified). Also did you sign anything accepting the servies? if so get copies of everything. Keep your cool, he cannot threaten you with action he doesn't intend to take! After he sends you to a collection agency the FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) kicks in and there is certain things that must happen.
the collection agency must verify that teh debt is good and current.
Also You will have a 30 day disputing period from the time the coll agency contacts you to dispute the bill, it must be marked disputed on your credit report by the coll. agency. If he cannot prove it's legitimacy to the coll. agency too. It must be canceled off your credit report and the coll. cannot persue it. a dn tehn hes pretty SOL- you can also take him to court after all this if it is false for deformation of charicter.
-Hope that helps a bitSet procedure for Collection Agencies to accept cases?
Can he send it to an agency? Yes. Will they accept the case? For only $200, probably not. Why? It's not worth their time.
Collection agents are under a lot of preasure to show results. In your case they will have to start by wasting time calling you on the phone for a few weeks to threaten you. During this time they are sending you letters. The cost in time/money starts adding up.
The agency gets from 30%-50% of what they collect. So in your case, is it worth spending $50 to make $60-$100? Nope. They are more interested in pestering the 70 year old retiree with medical problems who owes $23,000.
Your concern is their interfering with your credit history. So here is what you do. GET ARMED! Knowledge is your only weapon. Read the links below.
Send the CPA a letter outlining your objection to the debt, and threaten legal action if any negative reports are discovered on your credit history. NOTE: It is extremely unlikely that he has the ability to get this on your credit history. They do not have reporting rights. If he does somehow manage to do it, you have a wide range of laws to punish him under, including mail fraud.
Now if he gives it to Mr. Collection Agent, don't believe the nonsense that they are looking out for your interest and will ';verify'; your debt first. Their idea of ';verify the debt'; is to call the CPA and ask if you really owe this debt. If he says YES then they come after you. After all, they are in the business of debt collection, and this is how they earn a living.
What you want to do is send a letter to the collection agency demanding that they ';validate'; the debt. The differance is that now Mr. Collection Agent must research your debt, request all copies of contracts, logs, receipts, bills, and anything to do with how the amount you owe was calculate. And they must demonstrate that you actually have a legal obligation to pay it! After you revue this information, you decide if he has a case or not.
Mr. Collection Agent gets your letter, realizes he's about to spend a few hours of work for only $60-$100, and suddenly sends you a letter saying they are sending the collection back to the original creditor and removing your negative credit report.
Trust me, I've counseled many people on this. The worst case is they will sue you, and you simply explain your side to the judge. For $200 it's worth the gamble.
Whats a good website for buying phone cases?
i iwant to buy a phone case for my cell phone, the enV touch. but i need a website that has nice but cheap cases. i am thinking of buying one of those rubber ones maybe. links would be helpfulll.Whats a good website for buying phone cases?
www.sellfones.ca
www.kijiji.com
www.craigslist.org
www.ebay.com - the best
www.sellfones.ca
www.kijiji.com
www.craigslist.org
www.ebay.com - the best
Where would I be able to purchase cases of champagne on-line for a wedding or birthday party ?
Do you know what type you are looking for? if you do try going to their company website and buying it from there.Where would I be able to purchase cases of champagne on-line for a wedding or birthday party ?
you cant you have to buy it in person from a liquor store so that they can verify agetrilogy
you cant you have to buy it in person from a liquor store so that they can verify age
What white girl think of interracial rape statistic that black on white rape are most cases?
According to department of criminal justice, black on white rape account more than 90% of interracial sexual crime.
do you guys think black target white girl intentionally?What white girl think of interracial rape statistic that black on white rape are most cases?
Most blacks follow al harton and believes in him but he is racist and uses them to get money. This is why.What white girl think of interracial rape statistic that black on white rape are most cases?
I'd like a link to the official site and the page where you found those statistics please. I often search the US Department of Justice - Bureau of Justice Statistics pages and I haven't found any numbers like that. (I collect links like that since they are good to have for reference.)
On this page http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvu鈥?/a> you have to scroll down to page 30 there you have the statistics for white and black victims, the crime and if the offender was white or black.
* 16.7% of the rapes on whites was by a black rapist.
* 50.6% of the rapes on whites was by a white rapist.
* 0% of the rapes on blacks was by a white rapist.
* 43% of the rapes on blacks was by black rapist.
* 15.5% of the rapes on whites and 32.3% of the rapes on blacks were by a rapist with a race other than black/white.
The most interesting part of the statistics is that 0% of the whites rape blacks. That makes your question valid no matter if it's 90 % or 16.7 %, do the black men target white women intentionally? It sure looks like it. What other reason could there be that makes up for the difference, I can't find one. And it's not only black men it's men of other race too that does it. The numbers are lower than white men targeting white women but it's still odd since white men don't target black women.
Crime committed against white females are treated lightly in America. Thanks to years of affirmative actions.
do you guys think black target white girl intentionally?
Yes
do you guys think black target white girl intentionally?What white girl think of interracial rape statistic that black on white rape are most cases?
Most blacks follow al harton and believes in him but he is racist and uses them to get money. This is why.What white girl think of interracial rape statistic that black on white rape are most cases?
I'd like a link to the official site and the page where you found those statistics please. I often search the US Department of Justice - Bureau of Justice Statistics pages and I haven't found any numbers like that. (I collect links like that since they are good to have for reference.)
On this page http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvu鈥?/a> you have to scroll down to page 30 there you have the statistics for white and black victims, the crime and if the offender was white or black.
* 16.7% of the rapes on whites was by a black rapist.
* 50.6% of the rapes on whites was by a white rapist.
* 0% of the rapes on blacks was by a white rapist.
* 43% of the rapes on blacks was by black rapist.
* 15.5% of the rapes on whites and 32.3% of the rapes on blacks were by a rapist with a race other than black/white.
The most interesting part of the statistics is that 0% of the whites rape blacks. That makes your question valid no matter if it's 90 % or 16.7 %, do the black men target white women intentionally? It sure looks like it. What other reason could there be that makes up for the difference, I can't find one. And it's not only black men it's men of other race too that does it. The numbers are lower than white men targeting white women but it's still odd since white men don't target black women.
Crime committed against white females are treated lightly in America. Thanks to years of affirmative actions.
do you guys think black target white girl intentionally?
Yes
(a) Define prior restraint. (b) How has the supreme Court usually dealt with prior restraint cases?
Plz help ME it's due in 30 min.!!!(a) Define prior restraint. (b) How has the supreme Court usually dealt with prior restraint cases?
Prior restraint is when the government tells someone they can't publish something. It's generally seen as a violation of the First Amendment.
Generally when prior restraint is attempted, it's in the name of national security. But even then, it usually fails. A famous example was the Pentagon Papers, which the New York Times was enjoined from printing in 1971. The Supreme Court ruled that the Times could not be prevented from running the story.
The Supreme Court tends to look at prior restraint as an unreasonable and unconstitutional attempt by the government to muzzle the press.
Prior restraint is when the government tells someone they can't publish something. It's generally seen as a violation of the First Amendment.
Generally when prior restraint is attempted, it's in the name of national security. But even then, it usually fails. A famous example was the Pentagon Papers, which the New York Times was enjoined from printing in 1971. The Supreme Court ruled that the Times could not be prevented from running the story.
The Supreme Court tends to look at prior restraint as an unreasonable and unconstitutional attempt by the government to muzzle the press.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)